The Battle of Culloden (1964)

Cast

Get more information about The Battle of Culloden (1964) on IMDb

Genres & Description

Action Drama History War

7.9 / 10

A reconstruction of the Battle of Culloden, the last battle to take place on British soil, as if modern TV cameras were present.

Similar Movies

Asher

6.3

(2018)

Atone

3.7

(2019)

Model Shop

6.6

(1969)

Lightning Fists of Shaolin

6.6

(1984)

Comments on this trailer
Comments may include spoiler!

american White Sheep

I Think The Reason We have War with Our People is Genesis 3:15 ...I think if we All knew the Truth we would had never had any war's - @Thursday, March 2, 2017 4:47 AM

spindrift 1

is that a film - @Sunday, April 17, 2016 7:28 PM

дмитрий кузнецов

я вот только одного понять не могу-этот ролик висит в интернете довольно таки долго!!!!!!!!есть фотографии с места этих съемок----если это трейлер к фильму!? то где фильм и когда он выйдет!? непонятно!!!! если ето просто историческая реконструкция-то почему такие короткие ролики и нет полномасштабного видео!? короче вопросов больше чем ответов - @Sunday, May 17, 2015 10:27 AM

Epic Bagpipe Sound

The war wasnt about Scottish fighting English, it was about religion. Probably just as many Scottish fighting against the Jacobite as there were fighting for it. - @Tuesday, July 15, 2014 9:55 AM

The Irish Jacobite

Cumberland is a fucking murderer. - @Wednesday, September 4, 2013 6:27 AM

Conor McKee

That's it, fight the German monarchy! - @Wednesday, August 21, 2013 11:33 PM

2serveand2protect

Go Scotland! - @Friday, May 24, 2013 2:10 PM

2serveand2protect

...that's something I've never understood, too... - @Friday, May 24, 2013 2:10 PM

Mike Dobson

bonnie prince charlie got twatted in my home town lol - @Thursday, May 23, 2013 6:13 PM

John Feury

The astonishing thing about the I745 rebellion,was when the Jacobites were camped at Derby,an emissary arrives from London stating 9OOO troops stand between you and the capital,this was a bluff and they fell for it,instead of sending scouts to recce the area.The remnants of the Hanoverian army was struggling to cross the channel,they had just been defeated by the French,London was there for the taking.Instead The Jacobites head back to the Scottish border. So near yet so far. - @Saturday, May 18, 2013 2:22 PM

Sturty0

I'm a Yank..really?? how fucking strange...I woke up this morning went to work in Glasgow, then drove up to Stirling. Into Glasgow tomorrow for a lunch, playing golf on Sunday at Bonnington, that's Eaglesham East Renfrewshire..oh it all must be a dream and that coming from a fake Irishman. Go away and read some books...TWAT - @Friday, February 22, 2013 5:50 PM

Chucky ArLa

you arent even a Scot, you are a yank, i could tell instantly before i even saw your channel that you were. keep to your own nation. - @Friday, February 22, 2013 1:02 AM

Sturty0

No you are wrong...read a book, it was far more complicated than that. Have a look at the religions of all those who fought. POTS - @Sunday, January 20, 2013 7:46 PM

Sturty0

Another interesting point which many of us Scots dont want to deal with, is the fact that this battle was a civil war. Clans of the same name fought on each side, the Chisolms there Clan Chief fought on the side of Charlie his brother was in the goverment ranks. My own family fought on both sides. Also very old scores wanted to be settled that day, stealing of cows etc - @Sunday, January 20, 2013 7:41 PM

Sturty0

Interesting point, however in the Jacobite army there were catholics, presberteryans, episcopalians etc, the idea that this was in some way a religious war is actually innacurate, you are right it was about power. I will also agree with you that the Clan system was an archiatic system, brutal and out of date, however in the context of the highlands it worked. In England at the time the system although different was equally brutal. If Charles had of won the highlands would of been cleared - @Sunday, January 20, 2013 7:29 PM

hippyable

I'm Roman Catholic and we are not all liars. - @Friday, January 11, 2013 4:50 AM

hippyable

this makes me fuckin' sick to my stomach. the enemenies had canons and muskets. what the hell did they have. the fought and they knew they were going to die anyway. God damn the enemiea! - @Friday, January 11, 2013 4:49 AM

segano1

All it takes is just a look at his full name..'Charles Edward Louis John Casimir Sylvester Severino Maria Stuart' - to see what he stood for, he was far from a reincarnation of the old Scotland of the clans, but a fully fledged graduate of the pan-European Itilo-Polish, Franco-Irish Catholic international community. I told this to MrSPECTRUM7 here...watch?v=KDz4A7QO088, Con't below... - @Friday, December 7, 2012 11:14 PM

segano1

Con't... and he says that is doesn't matter whether he was Catholic, Protestant or Atheist because he was the rightful heir. But had the Darian episode not been abandoned, I doubt any of this would have even happened, he simply saw and opportunity after this, and seized power as a claimant, gaining approval from Catholics, even the French, and then create division within Scotland. - @Friday, December 7, 2012 11:14 PM

segano1

The only reason the Jacobites existed was to bring Scotland back to the dark ages by reinstating a Popish monarch once again, and using Scotland as the back door to England and make it easier to invade England through Scotland. The Jacobites and 'Bonnie' Prince Charlie have since been romanticised as tartan clad Scottish heroes, it couldn't have been any further from the truth in reality. It doesn't take a genius to see that, just check what Charles full name actually was and you'd see exactly. - @Thursday, December 6, 2012 4:18 AM

steven macfarlane

@dubhlochan. correct kin. - @Thursday, November 1, 2012 5:42 PM

steven macfarlane

@uafchris..you call one Scot an arsehole,you call us all arseholes..away and suck yer German queens titties ye wee boy.ALBA GU BRATH!! - @Sunday, October 28, 2012 3:58 PM

JustaScotsman

A crass racist comment is that the best you can do.? i presume your other braincell was on holiday when you wrote that. Its amazing how brave people can be sitting behind a computer, now run along to your next BNP meeting little boy.!! - @Sunday, October 28, 2012 8:30 AM

JustaScotsman

You really do talk nonsense dont you......cant read anymore.! Roll on independence.! - @Saturday, October 27, 2012 11:41 PM

JustaScotsman

Wrong it is documented that over 30,000 were butchered before during and after the battle by Butcher Cumberland..you are also wrong in the assumption that the jacobites were fighting to restore a Catholic religion most of the army and Charles himself preferred the episcoplian (English protestants) faith..also wrong with your british throne remark as Charles had stated he would revoke the union and create 4 seperate nations again with the Stuarts as monarch. Britain would no longer have existed. - @Saturday, October 27, 2012 11:39 PM

steven macfarlane

Just don't let o'Sullivan choose the battle field. - @Thursday, October 11, 2012 12:50 PM

dubhlochan

Scotland soon to be free in 2014. Who cares about what they were fighting for and the outcome that was decided. These gallant men died not in vain as their legend lives on and we are nearing the end of oppression - @Thursday, October 11, 2012 3:40 AM

Epic Bagpipe Sound

should never have been there, left flank got fucking slaughtered - @Sunday, September 30, 2012 10:13 PM

steven macfarlane

@mullahgrrl..yep,very true. ;) - @Sunday, September 23, 2012 2:36 PM

steven macfarlane

My great,great grandad died at the battle of colluden.a brave soul and god fearing man..he wasnae fighting though,he just went tae complain about the noise..BEATTIE!! Scottish at will,English at our pleasure.watch your cattle. - @Tuesday, September 18, 2012 5:45 PM

Mullahgrrl

The important thing to remember when discussing history on the internet is that there is always one faultless Good side and one rapacious Evil side. - @Monday, September 10, 2012 10:22 PM

Jon b

2014 is when we will have the last laugh! Then we will see the how the English get along with out Scotlands vast Natural rescources! - @Friday, August 31, 2012 7:10 AM

Teresa DeLallo

Been there...left with my opinion of the English somewhat lowered. "Cold the winds on the moor blows. Warm the enemy's fire's glow. Like the Harvest of Culloden, pain, and fear, and death grow." - @Friday, May 4, 2012 12:04 AM

segano1

.. - @Saturday, April 7, 2012 10:02 PM

L. Lindauer

Who has read Outlander? It is a very popular fiction novel that presents Culloden by a writer that did the research. - @Saturday, January 28, 2012 7:52 AM

manfred898

I love this, it's very well done! Is there any way to see the whole battlefield experience online? - @Saturday, January 21, 2012 12:51 PM

segano1

@XxtandcmancxX Wrong, it was more about Scottish Protestants vs the Catholics, the idea of Lowlanders vs Highlanders is just a unionist propagators written attempt at dividing Scotland. And no English soldier who fought for either the Protestant or Catholic side wore Tartan. - @Tuesday, January 17, 2012 11:42 PM

Clan Scottish Metal

@uafchris WTF has any of that got to do with my comment? When did I say the Stuarts were not pro catholic or pro french? All I said was innocent people were killed, to deny that is just fucking stupid. I look at it without bias, I'm not trying to paint the jacobites or the Stuarts as poor innocent victims, wrong was done on both sides. At no point do I say English people did all the slaughtering. And I'm not really a nationalist. I like how you assume things, isn't that what the edl do? - @Thursday, January 5, 2012 6:00 AM

Clan Scottish Metal

@46TheTruth Um ok? so not one single english troop fighting for the British army that day killed a person in cold blood? I'm not trying to just blame English troops for the slaughter that happened, but to say they had no part is just stupid. Every single history book or article I have read or documentary I have seen seems to agree. - @Tuesday, December 27, 2011 1:26 PM

Clan Scottish Metal

@john3000931 Totally, I don't disagree with that. There was many reasons it happened, but the main one was a dispute over the throne between the Stewarts and the Hannovarians. But there was the whole issue of religion (you know, the old catholic/protestant crap) And bad blood between clans, like the Stewarts and the Campbells. All I was saying is that there was English troops at the battle aswell, and they took part in the pacifications after the battle, just as much as the Scottish troops.. - @Monday, October 17, 2011 11:28 PM

John Henderson

@ClanScottishMetal Ur foegetting this wasnt Engand Vs Scotland.It was Government against rebellion.Two men fighting for a thrown, everyone else were pawns. - @Saturday, October 8, 2011 6:47 PM

Caitlin Binnie

@IVANNCHESNOKOV we are indeed - @Thursday, September 22, 2011 6:17 PM

Ivan Chesnokov

LOL SCOTTISH PEOPLE ARE WIERD - @Monday, September 19, 2011 8:30 PM

allan connochie

non-English members makes no difference. And English Tories only objected when Scottish Labour votes threatened to prop up Labour - but they had at the time no problem with Ulster Unionists previously helping prop up former Tory govts. Scots on the other hand had a real democratic deficit when the Tory UK govt stopped treating Scotland as an equal partner in the union and starting thinking about Scotlandshire. Pushing through hihgly unpopular legislation in Scotland on the back of English seats - @Sunday, September 18, 2011 8:15 AM

allan connochie

whinge and moan about the fact that Scotland has devolution. Fact of the matter since its modern inception as the UK of GB&NI we have always had a devolved constitution. Stormont was only ever suspended temporarily. There has never though been a West Belfast Question and it was only when a Scot pointed out there was a West Lothian Question that it became an issue. The difference is England suffers from what is largely a theoretic democratic deficit. In the vast majority of cases the votes of - @Sunday, September 18, 2011 8:10 AM

allan connochie

@fourganger88 "England has no parliament" It took decades to actually get a devolved Scottish Parliament. One of the reasons being Scots are only a minority at Westminster. The English on the other hand form a big majority of MPs at Wesminster. If there was a true call for an English Parlaiment then it would happen. Simple demographics ensure that. It is an issue largely for the English though. Up until now rather than arguing positively for English devolution most of its supporters simply - @Sunday, September 18, 2011 8:05 AM

segano1

@fourganger88 Westminster cannot reconvene the English parliament without making clear to all citizens of the UK and the global community that the United Kingdom was simply a political construct of the 1707 treaty. The ramifications internal and external to the United Kingdom do not bear contemplation for the mandarins at Whitehall. It would allow for a major revolution in English political life, in which the English once again have a Parliament of their own. - @Tuesday, September 6, 2011 12:29 AM

segano1

@fourganger88 Nope, fraid not, Scotland subsidises the UK treasury at it's own expence and has done so for years, as far back as the 70's, look up the GERS report, year by year, Scotland puts in more than it gets back. What you state is typical unionist myth made rubbish used to discourage the Scots from voting their rightful independence, your myths come straight out of the 70's and have only reared their ugly heads once again ever since Scotland reconvened it's parliament. - @Tuesday, September 6, 2011 12:24 AM

fourganger88

@segano1 So much of the good stuff Scotland has is subsidised by the English taxpayer. Not only that, but whilst Scotland has their own parliament as well as having Scottish MPS sit in Westminster, England has no parliament. You guys are on the gravy train. You certainly get more out of the Union that England does. - @Monday, September 5, 2011 11:38 PM

Embers73

@XxtandcmancxX With all due respect, even the way you describe it is an oversimplification. The sides at Culloden were not Highland v Lowland or Protestant v Catholic, I even doubt that most who fought at Culloden actually gave a monkeys about the Stuarts or the Hannovers. People found themselves on whichever side due to whose land they were living on, local grudges, or whose cat pissed on their fence. There were highlanders and lowlanders on both sides and also protestants and catholics. - @Tuesday, August 30, 2011 12:00 AM